The dependency approach in International Relations
The dependency approach in International Relations (IR) is a significant theoretical framework that emerged in the 1960s and 1970s, largely as a critique of traditional modernization theory. Modernization theory posited that underdeveloped nations could follow the same trajectory as developed nations by adopting Western-style economic policies, industrialization, and democratic governance. In contrast, the dependency approach emphasizes the structural inequalities in the global system, arguing that the economic development of some nations is fundamentally linked to the underdevelopment of others. It is a key perspective in understanding global power relations, particularly in the context of the Global South and its historical relationship with the Global North.
The central thesis of the dependency approach is that global capitalism is inherently exploitative, with wealthy, industrialized nations (the “core”) exploiting poorer, developing nations (the “periphery”) to maintain their economic dominance. The approach argues that these unequal relationships are deeply embedded in the global political economy, and they reproduce patterns of dependence and underdevelopment over time. Key arguments and components of the dependency approach can be divided into the following aspects:
1. Historical Roots of Dependency:
One of the fundamental ideas in the dependency approach is that the historical legacy of colonialism and imperialism continues to shape the economic relationships between countries today. Colonial powers extracted resources from their colonies, leaving behind weak economic structures in the colonized regions. After the colonial period ended, the newly independent countries did not experience true economic autonomy but rather became integrated into a global capitalist system that continued to exploit them. The historical process of colonization created an enduring structural relationship where the former colonial powers maintained economic control over the developing countries.
Dependency theorists argue that post-colonial countries were not able to fully break free from these colonial economic structures, and instead of achieving true independence, they became dependent on the developed nations for trade, technology, and capital. Thus, the global capitalist system perpetuates patterns of underdevelopment in the Global South.
2. Core-Periphery Structure:
A central idea in the dependency theory is the distinction between the core and the periphery. The core consists of highly industrialized and economically powerful countries, often referred to as the Global North (e.g., the United States, Western Europe, Japan), while the periphery includes the less-developed nations of the Global South (e.g., many African, Latin American, and Asian countries). The relationship between the two is asymmetrical, where the core countries dominate the economic system, control capital, technology, and trade, while the periphery countries remain dependent on the core for resources, technology, and capital.
This unequal relationship is reinforced through trade patterns, where the periphery specializes in raw materials and primary goods while the core nations focus on high-value industrial products and services. The periphery’s economic activities are shaped by the needs and demands of the core countries, resulting in the extraction of wealth from the periphery without significant reinvestment or development in the periphery itself.
3. Exploitation of Labor and Resources:
The dependency approach underscores the exploitation of labor and natural resources in the Global South by the Global North. The periphery countries often provide cheap labor and raw materials to the core countries, which process these materials into high-value goods. This economic relationship results in a net transfer of wealth from the periphery to the core, reinforcing the dependency of the former on the latter.
The exploitation is not limited to just raw materials or labor; it also extends to the financial sector. Developed nations often control the global financial institutions (e.g., the International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Bank) that set the terms of loans and economic policies for developing nations. These institutions often impose structural adjustment programs that require periphery countries to implement austerity measures, liberalize their economies, and open up their markets to foreign investments, all of which serve to further entrench dependency.
4. Structural Imbalance in Global Trade: According to dependency theory, the global trading system is inherently imbalanced. Trade is structured in a way that benefits the core countries, while the periphery remains at a disadvantage. The terms of trade for the periphery……
Read More….
Click Here to Buy MPS Assignment Solution 2025
The dependency approach in International Relations The dependency approach in International Relations The dependency approach in International Relations The dependency approach in International Relations The dependency approach in International Relations The dependency approach in International Relations The dependency approach in International Relations
